I’ve just read about NoGodTube on the Friendly Atheist. Apparently this is a response to the repeated complaints of theists and suspension of atheist’s YouTube accounts. The beauty of YouTube is that you can reach the whole world with your opinions. I understand the need to police these views and maintain certain standards but I would think that discussion would be something that YouTube would want to promote.
While it is a shame that some people seem to want to silence opposing views I find it more of a shame that the opposing views feel it necessary to retreat. I don’t feel that it aids the debate any more than idiotic flaming or attempts to ban contributors.
With NoGodTube, we can continue to debate, but on our terms. Theists will be able to present their arguments based on reason, but if they disagree with our responses, they won’t be able to get us banned or flame us.
I disagree that you can set the terms of a debate and have an open and honest discussion in a public forum. In a structured debate this is fine but YouTube offers a chance to have your say about anything and invites response from everyone. Removing yourself from that whether to GodTube (now Tangle) or NoGodTube is to cut yourself off from the marketplace of ideas.
The suppression of uncomfortable ideas may be common in religion or in politics, but it is not the path to knowledge, and there’s no place for it in the endeavor of science. We do not know beforehand where fundamental insights will arise from about our mysterious and lovely solar system. The history of our study of our solar system shows us clearly that accepted and conventional ideas are often wrong, and that fundamental insights can arise from the most unexpected sources.
— Carl Sagan